Currently set to Index
Currently set to Follow

United States were themselves answerable to another power, a foreign power, and a power which had been steadfastly seeking to extend its control over die young republic of the United States since its very inception. This power was the financial power of England, centered in the London Branch of the House of Rothschild. The fact was that in 1910, the United States was for all practical purposes being ruled from England, and so it is today

United States were themselves answerable to another power, a foreign power, and a power which had been steadfastly seeking to extend its control over die young republic of the United States since its very inception. This power was the financial power of England, centered in the London Branch of the House of Rothschild. The fact was that in 1910, the United States was for all practical purposes being ruled from England, and so it is today.

Thus we see that the 1910 plot to seize control of the money and credit of the people of the United States was planned by men who already controlled most of the country’s resources. It seemed to John Moody ‘practically automatic” that they should continue with their operations.

What John Moody did not know, or did not tell his readers, was that the most powerful men in the United States were themselves answerable to another power, a foreign power, and a power which had been steadfastly seeking to extend its control over die young republic of the United States since its very inception.

This power was the financial power of England, centered in the London Branch of the House of Rothschild. The fact was that in 1910, the United States was for all practical purposes being ruled from England, and so it is today.

In the early 1900’s huge amounts of capital are exported from England to the USA as it becomes the economic driving nation around the globe.

In 1907 an international banking crisis starts in New York. The trust companies of New York who are not members of the clearing system become insolvent and this causes hundreds of American banks to fail. This panic episode was created by JP Morgan who spread rumors about failing banks through the press.

This is their typical tactic; create a problem, create political will for change, then come to the rescue. Thus the money masters have found their door of opportunity. In November of 1910, these international bankers of Europe meet with the Robber Barons of the United States in a private meeting on Jekyll Island, just off the coast of Georgia. This is where they planned their strategy to impose the money cartel of the private banking under the illusion of a US Government controlled federal bank.

Thus, in 1913 the US Federal Reserve bank is established and the money masters or International bankers gain their control in the USA’s monetary systems. This is a very sad day for America, as they’ve now sold out their national sovereignty and civil liberties, but to the masses this is invisible.

In 1914 the 1st World War starts and lasts for four years. The International bankers make a fortune lending money to countries in Europe to support their militaries. The strategy as usual is to lend the money to nation leaders for military efforts with the future taxes on the masses used as collateral. The bankers hedge their bets by lending to both the Germans and the allied forces fighting the German advances.

In 1917 the USA enters the war in Europe. The war creates a boom in the United States as they are the main supplier of manufactured goods as well as oil which tips the balance for the allies to defeat the Germans. At the end of the war the treaty of Versailles gives Britain, the USA and allied countries economic control over Germany. During the war German scientists

This power was the financial power of England, centered in the London Branch of the House of Rothschild. The fact was that in 1910, the United States was for all practical purposes being ruled from England, and so it is today.

The ten largest bank holding companies in the United States are firmly in the hands of certain banking houses, all of wliicit have branches in London. They are J.P. Morgan Company, Brown Brothers Harriman, Warburg, Kuhn Loeb and J. Henry Schroder.

All of them maintain close relationships with the House of Rothschild, principally through the Rothschild control of international money markets through its manipulation of the price of gold. Each day, the world price of gold is set in the London office of N.M. Rothschild and Company.

The Money Problem

In November of 1910, seven individuals arranged an ultra-secret meeting on Jekyll Island, off the coast from Brunswick, Georgia … an island that J.P. Morgan had purchased in the not too distant past. The seven individuals were: (1) Charles Norton, President of the First National Bank in New York, part of the J.P. Morgan financial empire; (2) Henry Davison, a senior partner in the J.P. Morgan Company; (3) Benjamin Strong, kingpin of J.P. Morgan’s Banker’s Trust Company; (4) Frank Vanderlip, President of New York City’s National City Bank and who was standing in for William Rockefeller, as well as for Kuhn, Loeb, & Company, a powerful international investment house; (5) Paul Warburg who was not only a partner in Kuhn, Loeb, & Company, but, as well, he was representing the interests of the Rothschild banking empire located in France and England, and he also was the brother of Max Warburg who oversaw the Warburg banking empire in Germany; (6) Nelson Aldrich, Senate Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, as well as father-in-law to John D. Rockefeller and a business associate of J.P. Morgan; and, finally, (7) Abraham Andrew, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Department.

At the time, J.P. Morgan, the Rockefellers, the Rothschild family, and the Warburg brothers collectively controlled at least one-fourth of the world’s financial wealth. They ran a network of banks, investment houses, and other financial entities that influenced a great deal of commercial and political life in Europe and the United States. The meeting had a fairly straightforward agenda.

They wanted to find a way to take financial control of the United States. Mayer Rothschild once said: “Give me control over a nation’s currency, and I care not who makes its laws.” He was alluding to the fact that money actually tends to rule what goes on in a country, not its laws, and, the people who were meeting on Jekyll Island were interested in putting that principle into practice in the United States. Up until the 1880s, most banks in America were national banks.

Those banks were chartered by the federal government. However, by 1910, the year of the meeting as Jekyll Island, national banks constituted only a small percentage of the overall number of banks in the United States.

Not only were non-national banks exploding in numbers — more than doubling in the first ten years of the 1900s — but, by 1910, those non-national institutions constituted over 65 % of the banks in America.

The national banks tended to be located in the big cities along the East coast. The non-national banks were proliferating in both the western and southern portions of the United States … in cities both big and small. As a result, the big banks were losing their market share of the financial industry to the smaller, non-national banking institutions. With a diminishing market share, the commercial and political influence of the big banks was also being affected in a variety of ways. Banks — whether they were national or non-national in character —loaned money to individuals, businesses, organizations, and governments. Ostensibly, the money loaned out came from the deposits made by a bank’s customers.

However, banks loaned a great deal more money than was on deposit. Generally speaking, the banks leveraged their deposits by a factor of 10 to 1 … which meant that banks tended to loan out ten dollars for each dollar that was on deposit.

These leveraged deposits led to loans that often cycled back to the bank as deposits from the people or businesses that had been given loans. Consequently, rather than leveraging deposits by a factor of 10 to 1, banks could end up leveraging the original deposits by a factor that, depending on circumstances, might rise to as much as 300 to 1. Usually speaking, this Potemkin arrangement worked.

On average, only 3% of depositors wanted their money back at any given time, and, therefore, the banks had an opportunity to move the financial cards around in their game of ‘Three-card Monte. In other words, many banks operated in a way that induced their depositors to adopt a ‘false belief’ concerning the real financial condition of those banks at any given point in time. For the most part, there was literally nothing in the way of actual ‘money to back up most of the loan and investment activities of banks.

In 1927, Sir Josiah Stamp, head of the Bank of England, admitted to an audience at the University of Texas that banks — not governments —create money. Banks accomplish this through the mechanism of debt that loans money into existence, and with respect to this process, Sir Josiah Stamp warned the audience — apparently to no avail — that: “… if you want to continue to be the slaves of banks and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit.” Everything was a matter of accounting gimmicks. If one took the amount of money that was actually in a given bank’s vaults at any point in time and compared that against the amount of money that had been loaned and invested by the bank, the two figures would be very different from one another. Therefore, accounting tricks were invented to reconcile the differences. One learned how to categorize and label financial transactions in a variety of ways to paper over the fact that banks were largely a function of smoke and mirrors because most of the money they loaned out or invested didn’t actually exist … until it was loaned or invested. From time to time, however, a perfect storm of political and/or economic events came together that would, in one way or another, either move depositors to begin withdrawing their money from the bank, or such events would lead to other forms of financial problems for the bank. Ultimately, all roads led to the same place — namely, because a bank had loaned out and/or invested more money than had been deposited into it, those banks didn’t have sufficient funds on hand to meet the increasing demands of depositors and/or other creditors.

As a result, the bank would either have to declare a bank holiday in order to buy the time needed to be able to come up with the money that would repay depositors what they were owed, or the bank would have to come up with some sort of public relations spiel to try to quell the insistence of depositors and creditors to receive the money that was owed to them.

When the foregoing stalling ploys did not work, banks would become insolvent, and the depositors who still thought they had money in the bank would lose out. In short, banks were permitted to commit fraud.

They knowingly made false financial claims (e.g., your money is safe and will be returned to you whenever you like) that induced people to deposit money that, when things went sour, would disappear. For a variety of reasons — and somewhat ironically — the foregoing sorts of panics were not necessarily a reflection of difficult economic times but often took place under conditions of prosperity when many people and businesses were borrowing money in order to take advantage of prosperous times, and as a result, banks didn’t have much of a margin with respect to on-hand reserves.

Many kinds of economic factors might lead to the bank’s equivalent of a margin call. On those occasions, if banks were loan/investment rich but revenue poor, the banks were in trouble, and, therefore, so were their depositors … they were all facing a cash-flow or liquidity problem of one description or another. The seven individuals who met on Jekyll Island were interested in organizing the foregoing issues in a manner that would be advantageous to the big banks. For instance, the Jekyll Island seven wanted the large national banks to be able to reassert dominance in the financial markets relative to the increasing number of non-national and, usually, smaller banks.

Consequently, the Jekyll Island 7 — and those they represented –wanted to be able to exert a considerable measure of control over the non-national banks by centralizing the administration of the banking industry.

In the process, the smaller, non-national banks would be required to follow the rules of financial engagement that would be introduced into, and controlled by, the banking system in accordance with the ideas being advanced on Jekyll Island in 1910.

Perhaps, most importantly, the members at the Jekyll Island meeting wanted to come up with a persuasive sales pitch that would convince the American public and the members of Congress that the whole purpose of revamping the banking industry was to protect and serve ‘we the People’ — even though this was not the reason why the aforementioned seven individuals had gathered together.

However, in order to accomplish this, the Jekyll Island 7 would have to convince legislators and the public alike that the process of re-organizing the banking industry was something other than the grab for power that it actually was.

The American people disliked monopolies, trusts, and cartels. Therefore, the Jekyll Island 7 needed to develop a marketing and sales strategy that would dispel that kind of distrust by making the idea of a revamped banking system appear to be something other than the financial cartel is was intended to be.

The individual who was responsible for getting Wilson nominated for President during the convention of the Democrats was Colonel Edward House. As a result, he became a close political advisor for Wilson.

Colonel House was also the individual who introduced Wilson to the ideas of Jekyll Island. Although Wilson had: passed the bar exam in Georgia, earned a doctorate in history and political, become the President of Princeton University, and served as Governor of New Jersey, by his own admission, he knew little about banking and monetary issues.

Therefore, Wilson relied heavily on the ‘knowledge’ of Colonel House for his ‘understanding’ of such matters. The understanding that Wilson

UNITED NATIONS, THE FEDERAL BANK RESERVE is A rigged game. The bankers risk nothing in the game; they just collect their percentage and ‘win it all. Our real life situation is MUCH WORSE than any poker game. In a poker game, none [are] forced to go into debt, and anyone can quit at any time and keep whatever he still has.

The United Nations is the greatest fraud in all history. The Knights of Malta (formerly Knights Templar) are the premiere secret society of the Vatican these days. Washington, D.C. is the new Rome, and the Vatican represents the Old Rome. It goes deeper. The new Rome represents the New World, and old Rome represents the Old World.

“I challenge the illusion that the U.N. is an instrument of peace. It could not be less of a cruel hoax if it had been organized in Hell for the sole purpose of aiding and abetting the destruction of the United States.” – J. B. Matthews, former chief investigator for the House Committee on Un-American Activities(140, p. 288).

“The UN is the biggest fraud in all history. Its purpose is to destroy the United States.” – John Rankin, U.S. Congressman(17, p. 33).

⦁ The UN is the biggest fraud in all history.
⦁ For decades, the Federal Reserve has been acting more like a mafia syndicate than a financial stabilizer of the US economy. The saying goes that the love of money is the root of all evil, and that root leads directly to the Federal Reserve banksters and the global financial mafia.
⦁ In the 2000 years since then, the corrupt money changers and tax collectors have only grown more powerful through their sneaky tactics, and have continued to systematically turn most people into peasants or debt slaves. “The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender,” reads Proverbs 22:7.

“The UN is but a long-range, international-banking apparatus neatly set up…by a small group of powerful One- World Revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power.” – Curtis B. Dall, FDR: My Exploited Father-in-Law. Washington, D.C.: Action Associates, 1970.

“The time has come to recognize the United Nations for the anti-American, anti-freedom organization that it has become [or always was!]. The time has come for us to cut off all financial help, withdraw as a member, and ask the United Nations to find a headquarters location outside the United States that is more in keeping with the philosophy of the majority of voting members, someplace like Moscow or Peking.” – U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater, Congressional Record, October 26, 1971.

“[Members of the CFR want] a One World Socialist State governed by ‘experts’ like themselves….[They seek] policies which favor…gradual surrender of United States sovereignty to the United Nations.” – Edith Kermit Roosevelt (granddaughter of President Theodore Roosevelt), Indianapolis News, December 23, 1961.

“The American people see the United Nations aspiring to establish itself the central authority of a new international order of global laws and global governance….Americans look with alarm at UN claims to a monopoly on international moral legitimacy. They see this as a threat to the…freedoms of the American people, a claim of political authority over America and its elected leaders without their consent….As the UN seeks to impose its Utopian vision of international law on Americans, we can add this question: Where do we go when we don’t like the laws of the world?… [A] United Nations that seeks to impose its presumed authority on the American people without their consent begs for confrontation…” – Senator Jesse Helms, addressing the U.N. Security Council on January 20, 2000(18, p. 264).

A rigged game

It is no secret that money is a very powerful force, either for good or for evil–either to make the world go around or to turn it upside down. The globalist conspirators realized this very early on, and have used money as a tool to control governments, and thereby to enslave the masses.

Back at the turn of the 19th century, a famous international banker, Baron Nathan Meyer de Rothschild, who, as mentioned earlier, was a personal friend of Weishaupt, had thusly bragged: “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws”(35, p. 9). Another revealing statement about money being used as a tool for political power was made by John Maynard Keynes, a famous English economist and a member of the Fabian (socialist) Society of England (another globalist front group): “There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose”.

“In that dark crew of financial pirates there are those who would cut a man’s throat to get a dollar out of his pocket; there are those who send money into the states to buy votes to control our legislation; and there are those who maintain an international propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us and wheedling us into the granting of new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime….

“When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here…. “[It amounts to a] super-state controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure.

“Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is–the Fed has usurped the government….It controls everything here [in Congress] and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will”.

How the international bankers are pulling off their sinister secret takeover of this country (and indeed, the whole world) was perhaps best summed up by author Sheldon Emry: “It is easy to see that no matter how skillfully they [the common people] play, eventually the ‘banker’ will end up with all of his original chips back, and except for the very best players, the rest, if they stay in long enough, will lose to the ‘banker’ their homes, their farms, their businesses, perhaps even their cars, watches, rings, and the shirts off their backs (whatever they have mortgaged).

Our real life situation is MUCH WORSE than any poker game. In a poker game, none [are] forced to go into debt, and anyone can quit at any time and keep whatever he still has. But in real life, even if we borrow little ourselves from the bankers, the local, provincial, and federal governments borrow billions in our name, squander it, then confiscate our earnings from us and pay it back to the bankers with interest. We are forced to play the game and none can leave except by death. We pay as long as we live, and our children pay after we die. If we cannot pay, the same government sends the police to take our property and give it to the bankers.

The bankers risk nothing in the game; they just collect their percentage and ‘win it all—(42, p. 21).

One of the most profitable games that the international bankers like to play is the stock market–a game that they simply cannot lose. Here’s roughly how it works:

First they raise interest rates, creating a panic, and causing many to sell out their stocks cheap.

Their next step is to buy up these stocks in great hoards. After this, they wait for a while, so as not to arouse suspicions, and then lower the interest rates. This, of course, soon results in an upsurge in the economy.

Next they begin selling their cheaply-purchased stocks at a tremendous profit.

Another foolproof, profit-making venture for these bankers is the bond market. This is one of their favorite games to play, as it is most successful, not just for making a financial killing, but for putting a strangle hold on the nation which they target through this game.

The rules of this game are quite simple. All that needs to be done is for the “big boys” to send out their agents to buy up thousands, even millions, of government bonds.

Soon an artificial, temporary condition of prosperity will ensue in that nation, as this action will quickly raise the value of its bonds, fooling the masses into taking out large loans and making huge credit purchases, thinking that the booming economy is there to stay. After waiting a while, so as to not arouse suspicions and to allow time for the people to go into debt, our banker friends then suddenly dump all of these bonds on the market, plummeting their value.

Soon the economy of the target nation takes a huge plunge, and nearly all of its citizens are left wondering what in the world happened. The bankers then walk away, exulting in the high-interest debts that the people now owe them, both collectively and individually, which are impossible, or nearly impossible, to pay because the economy now lies in ruins (in which case the bankers offer enormously profitable loans to the government for “economic revival,” which drive up banker profits even more).

Once again the bankers win and the people lose. Quite a deal, wouldn’t you say? The globalists have an unending list of tricks up their sleeves through which they work to amass tremendous wealth while driving millions into desperate poverty.

But perhaps their most favorite game of all, and one that is easiest to play, is to simply spread false, panic-inducing rumors in financial publications, gloomily speculating about a particular targeted nation’s economy, which results in a massive withdrawal of foreign investments.

This, in turn, brings the nation to its knees, on the verge of a total economic collapse, and thus unable to resist the temptation to take enormously oppressive, high-interest loans from the international monetary scavengers. Understand that the real objective for these unscrupulous thieves is not so much to make more money, but to take more of ours–to drive us ever further into poverty and to make us helpless dependents.

Representative Ron Paul (R-Texas), one of the few people in Congress who has fought valiantly against this fraudulent banking system over the years, wrote the following remarks back in 1983, in one of his newsletters: “As a member of the House Banking Committee, I have long believed that present economic difficulties are caused principally by our centralized banking system headed by the Federal Reserve, and by the use of irredeemable paper money.

In Las Vegas, all games are rigged to pay the owner a percentage, and they rake in millions. The Federal Reserve bankers’ ‘game’ is also rigged, and it pays off in billions!” The founder´s of the FED introduced a crooked dealer (the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM) into an honest poker game.

The world is a rigged game. The Bankers are playing a rigged game
They creates the rules for the game. They control both sides of the game. They can therefore lose nothing

All the American government institutions have an underlying principle of honesty and trust built into them. A system that is meant to do A and does B because of insider manipulation can manipulate profits to a select group of individuals but destroys trust in the system and the institution of government. We now have that working in the financial markets. Everything is “rigged” — currently to go up but can go down when the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM and its bankers want it to.

Conceptually, these men introduced a crooked dealer (the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM) into an honest poker game.

Further, they insulated themselves with black letter law in the Dodd Frank Act to make themselves the chief “cop” in financial regulatory markets. As a result, they made trillions of dollars but it was from billions of transactions among common people.

Our financial systems have become corrupt by design. The men behind the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM and its banks created this system over a period of 100 years. They have changed laws because they know that laws and force are interchangeable. They needed force of law to cover their thefts.

They now have a view in mind that they have labelled and call “The New World Order”. It enables the illuminati dream of ruling the world using corporate fascist legislative control and communist philosophy population control. Now is the time to stop them. The Internet can provide the truth in many areas and can expose these arrogant men. Frederic Bastiat says it best:

“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.”

We are moving toward a dictatorship of relativism which does not recognize anything as for certain and which has as its highest goal one’s own ego and one’s own desires.

An Interest-ing Paradox

This concept has many names: the “Compound Interest Paradox,” the “Debt Virus,” and the “Impossible Contract Problem.” U.S. Senator, Jack Metcalf, (R-WA) has his own way of explaining this problem: “Four cowboys put up their belongings as collateral to borrow a deck of cards. The hitch is that each of the four must bring back 14 cards at the end of the evening — a mathematical impossibility (there are only 52 cards in all, that is to say, 13 to each.) In the end, one player ends up with only 10 cards and loses his belongings… That is the problem with the Fed. It creates money to make loans but it doesn’t create the money to pay the interest.”

“To grasp the truth that periodic withdrawal of money through interest payments will inexorably transfer all wealth in the nation to the receiver of interest, imagine yourself in a poker or dice game where everyone must buy the chips (the medium of exchange) from a ‘banker’ who does not risk chips in the game. He just watches the table and reaches in every hour to take 10 percent to 15 percent of all the chips on the table. As the game goes on, the amount of chips in the possession of each player will fluctuate according to his luck. However, the total number of chips available to play the game (carry on trade and business) will decrease steadily. As the game starts getting low on chips, some players will run out. If they want to continue to play, they must buy or borrow more chips from the ‘banker.’ The ‘banker’ will sell (lend) them only if the player signs a ‘mortgage’ agreeing to give the ‘Banker’ some real property (car, home, farm, business. etc.) if he cannot make periodic pay ments to pay back all the chips plus some extra chips (interest). The payments must be made on time, whether he wins (makes a profit) or not. It is easy to see that no matter how skillfully they play, eventually the ‘banker’ will end up with all of his original chips back, and except for the very best players, the rest, if they stay in long enough, w ill lose to the ‘banker’ their homes, their farms, their businesses, perhaps even their cars, watches, and the shirts off their backs!”

“Our real life situation is much worse than any poker game. In a poker game no one is forced into debt, and anyone can quit at any time and keep whatever he still has. But in real life, even if we borrow little ourselves from the ‘bankers.’ our local, State and Federal governments borrow billions in our name, squander it, then confiscate our earnings via taxation in order to pay off the bankers with interest. We are forced to play the game, and none can leave except by death. We pay as long as we live, and our children pay after we die. If we cannot or refuse to pay, the government sends the police to take our property and give it to the bankers. The bankers risk nothing in the game; they just collect their percentage and “win it all.” In Las Vegas, all games are rigged to pay the owner a percentage, and they rake in millions. The Federal Reserve bankers’ ‘game’ is also rigged, and it pays off in billions!” – Sheldon Emry. Billions for Bankers. Debt for the People. 1956.

A little-known feature of the world economic system also transcends the local economic system and traduces into “super imperialism,” a significant F of the FIRM: The financial control of the world’s economy.

This is laid out in economist’s Michael Hudson recently revised book, “Super Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire:'” He writes: The United States now rules not through its position as world creditor but as world debtor, making other countries lenders to itself simply by building up their own central bank reserves in the form of U.S. Treasury securities.

This rigged game of dollarizing the world’s central bank reserves has enabled America to flood the world with dollars without constraint as it appropriates foreign resources and companies, builds military bases and outposts, and imports foreign goods and services giving nothing in return except treasury IOU´s of questionable (and shrinking) value.

Rather than America’s debtor position being an elemental weakness, it has become the foundation of the world’s monetary and financial system. The rationale for America’s ability to retain its role as world banker and key currency status no longer reflects the 1945 postwar faith in its moral leadership in the rhetoric of open markets. Its diplomats have shown a readiness to play the role of wrecker if foreign central banks stop re-lending their dollar inflows to the U.S.Treasury. This is a complex issue, well documented in this important book. In biology and society, new forms cannot arise if there is no variety if there are no mutations in thinking that lead to new ideas to give us a chance to survive.

Richard Wolff, one of the leading socialist economists in the US, summarizes as follows: To preserve their accumulating wealth, large corporations and those they enrich wield ever more undemocratic power over the political and cultural realms of society. Their goals are self-preservation and self-aggrandizement.

These features of capitalism are all social failures in terms of justice, democracy, equality, liberty, and ecological sanity. Yet mainstream media, politicians, and academics doggedly act and speak as though capitalism were the obviously “optimal_ system to be continued, reinforced, and celebrated. By proceeding as though we are not in fact experiencing capitalism’s systemic failures, they perform their ideological assignments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *