New evidence suggests iceberg didn’t cause Titanic sinking. Titanic and Estonia???

Documentary claims Titanic was badly damaged before setting off on maiden voyage

The Titanic sank as a result of a fire, not simply a collision with an iceberg, a new TV show has claimed.

Titanic: The New Evidence, which aired on Channel 4 on Sunday, argued that photos of the iconic ship show a dark mark on her hull before she left Southampton — at the same spot the iceberg struck — which supports the theory.

“This isn’t a simple story of colliding with an iceberg and sinking.

“It’s a perfect storm of extraordinary factors coming together: fire, ice and criminal negligence.”

But journalist Senan Molony, who has been researching the disaster for 30 years, believes that a fire in a coalbunker caused serious damage to the Titanic’s hull – in the same area where the iceberg later hit – and is the real reason for the disaster.

Mr Molony suggests, in the documentary Titanic: The New Evidence, that the fire had been raging since she left the shipyard in Belfast, meaning those in charge could be criminally negligent.

He says the 1,000C temperatures weakened the hull so much that when the Titanic collided with an iceberg what could have been a minor knock became an unimaginable disaster

In 1898, a man named Morgan Robertson wrote a book titled “Wreck of the Titan“- about a luxury liner deemed unsinkable, that was going too fast in the North Atlantic and hit an iceberg, killing most everyone on board due to lack of lifeboats.

14 years later, this fictional book would play out in real life, exactly- down to the name, with the wreck of the Titanic;  but this time, it would have major political implications. Some of the wealthiest men in the world were on that ship and some were opposed to the newly proposed Federal Reserve and central banks.

The long-term strategy of the elite banking (Rothschild family) and royal bloodline families was simple: Gain control of the global gold supply in order to maintain power through the control of global currency and its underlying collateral.

The Jekyll Island  conference held in 1910, offered a secluded location to discuss secret banking ideas and ultimately brought about the development of a private coup that eventually became known as the Federal Reserve Banking System.

In November of 1910, Senator Aldrich invited several bankers and economic scholars to attend a conference on Jekyll Island. The bankers in attendance were:  Morgan, Warburg, House, Wilson, Aldrich, Vanderbilt, Rockefeller and Schiff.  While meeting under the ruse of a duck-shooting excursion, these financial experts were “hunting” for a way to restructure (their) America’s banking system and eliminate (create) the possibility of future economic panics.

Who Built The Titanic?

22 April 1908 – the date White Star Line announced that they would also be building a sister ship to Olympic, the Titanic.

The RMS Titanic was built by Harland and Wolff, the Belfast-based shipbuilders. The owners were the White Star Line.

Thomas Andrews was the naval architect in charge of designing the ship (he joined the maiden voyage and died aboard Titanic when she sank).

The British-born Joseph Bruce Ismay was the chairman of the White Star Line, whilst the American J. P. Morgan was the financier.

International Mercantile Marine Co. (IMM) were the parent corporation of the White Star Line.

Titanic was built in response to the earlier arrival of new, faster liners from the rival company Cunard (see ‘Cunard – The Rivals’ below).

J.P morgon was the finacier behind the company who built Titanic

Newspapers of that time were owned by Morgan and other rich financiers, who praised the unsinkable Titanic, saying she was of “unrivaled extent and magnificence.”  They managed to attract the richest and most respected people of society to take the first trans-Atlantic journey aboard the Titanic.

All of the millionaires on the Titanic journey were opposed to the new plan to create a private central bank in the USA, because it would negatively affect their personal fortunes.  This was an issue for the Rothschild-Rockefeller-Morgan cartel.

  1. In 1898, a man named Morgan Robertson wrote a book titled “Wreck of the Titan“- about a luxury liner deemed unsinkable, that was going too fast in the North Atlantic and hit an iceberg, killing most everyone on board due to lack of lifeboats.
  2. Titanic: The New Evidence, which aired on Channel 4 on Sunday, argued that photos of the iconic ship show a dark mark on her hull before she left Southampton — at the same spot the iceberg struck — which supports the theory.
  3. The Jekyll Island  conference held in 1910, offered a secluded location to discuss secret banking ideas and ultimately brought about the development of a private coup that eventually became known as the Federal Reserve Banking System.
  4. The long-term strategy of the elite banking (Rothschild family) and royal bloodline families was simple: Gain control of the global gold supply in order to maintain power through the control of global currency and its underlying collateral.
  5. Newspapers of that time were owned by Morgan and other rich financiers, who praised the unsinkable Titanic, saying she was of “unrivaled extent and magnificence.”  They managed to attract the richest and most respected people of society to take the first trans-Atlantic journey aboard the Titanic.
  6. He says the 1,000C temperatures weakened the hull so much that when the Titanic collided with an iceberg what could have been a minor knock became an unimaginable disaster (Weakened steel strategy to destroy, even to destory big and high building)
  7. All of the millionaires on the Titanic journey were opposed to the new plan to create a private central bank in the USA, because it would negatively affect their personal fortunes.  This was an issue for the Rothschild-Rockefeller-Morgan cartel.
  8. The British-born Joseph Bruce Ismay was the chairman of the White Star Line, whilst the American J. P. Morgan was the financier.

Why I wrote this post? It is not about Titanic actually, it is about Estonia who sunk 1994.

Is there any similarities?

Money, power, manipulated weakenings in steel construction to cause a disaster, fires on board to weakening the steel construction in the hull, Sweden was going to voting for eu entry 1½ month after Estonia sunk